College Students Attitudes Towards Male Birth Control

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, USA

2 Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA

3 University of Cincinnati College of Education, Criminal Justice and Human Services, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

4 James Madison University, College of Health and Behavioral Studies, USA



Background: Up to 50 percent of pregnancies in the United States are unintended with the highest rates occurring among women between the ages of 18 and 24 years old. Only 52 percent of sexually active college students used a method of contraception during their most recent sexual intercourse with male condoms and female birth control pills being the most common methods. Both methods however are used inconsistently and incorrectly. These challenges create a need for alternative methods of contraception. Male-directed contraception (MDC) is seen as a potential solution to this challenge.

: The purpose of this study was to assess college students’ attitudes towards various developmental methods of MDC including male birth control pills, transdermal gels, injections, and implants.

: Data were collected from college students at one Midwestern University.

Results: Females had higher attitudes towards each method of MDC compared to males. Identifying as female, agnostic, Jewish, and being single but in a monogamous relationship were associated with more positive attitudes towards various MDC methods. Being on a government healthcare policy and race were associated with more negative attitudes towards MDC. The number of sexual partners and condom use were not significant predictors of attitudes towards MDC.

Conclusions: This analysis provides additional evidence to the growing literature of attitudes towards and acceptability of MDC. Despite this evidence, research remains inconsistent. These inconsistences provide researchers with opportunities to continue our understanding of factors associated with attitudes towards and acceptability of MDC methods in college students and other populations.


Main Subjects

Bishop, J. M., Rosen, B. L., Rojas-Guyler, L., Bernard, A., & Wilson, B. (2022). Intention to use novel methods of male directed contraception among college students. Journal of Sexual Health Psychology, 1(1), 11-29.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Unmarried Men’s Contraceptive Use at Recent Sexual Intercourse: United States, 2011-2015. Retrieved from
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Contraception. Retrieved from
Daniels, K., Daugherty, J., Jones, J., & Mosher, W. (2015). Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15– 44: United States, 2011–2013 (National Health Statistics Reports, No. 86). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Darroch, J. E. (2008). Male fertility control—where are the men? Contraception, 78(4), S7-S17.
Dismore, L., Van Wersch, A., & Swainston, K. (2016). Social constructions of the male contraception pill: When are we going to break the vicious circle? Journal of health psychology, 21(5), 788-797.
Eberhardt, J., Van Wersch, A., & Meikle, N. (2009). Attitudes towards the male contraceptive pill in men and women in casual and stable sexual relationships. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 35(3), 161-165.
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the united states, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(2), 90-96.
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the united states, 2008–2011. The New England Journal of Medicine, 374(9), 843-852.
Frost, J. J., Lindberg, L. D., & Finer, L. B. (2012). Young adults' contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: associations with risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44(2), 107-116.
Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Houlihan, A. E., Stock, M. L., & Pomery, E. A. (2008). A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental review, 28(1), 29-61.
Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & Lane, D. J. (2003). A social reaction model of adolescent health risk. In J.M. Suls & K.A. Wallston (EDS.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 107-136). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Gibbons, F.X., Stock, M.L., Gerrard, M., & Finneran, S. (2015). The prototype-willingness model. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting and changing health behavior: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed., pp. 189-224). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Gibbons, F. X., Stock, M. L., & Gerrard, M. (2020). The prototype‐willingness model. The Wiley encyclopedia of health psychology, 517-527.
Glasier, A. (2010). Acceptability of contraception for men: a review. Contraception, 82(5), 453-456.
Gu, Y., Liang, X., Wu, W., Liu, M., Song, S., Cheng, L., ... & Peng, L. (2009). Multicenter contraceptive efficacy trial of injectable testosterone undecanoate in Chinese men. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 94(6), 1910-1915.
Heinemann, K., Saad, F., Wiesemes, M., White, S., & Heinemann, L. (2005). Attitudes toward male fertility control: results of a multinational survey on four continents. Human Reproduction, 20(2), 549-556.
Higgins, T. M., Dougherty, A. K., Badger, G. J., & Heil, S. H. (2018). Comparing long-acting reversible contraception insertion rates in women with Medicaid vs. private insurance in a clinic with a two-visit protocol. Contraception, 97(1), 76-78.
Hill, N. J., Siwatu, M., & Robinson, A. K. (2014). “My religion picked my birth control”: The influence of religion on contraceptive use. Journal of religion and health, 53(3), 825-833.
Langmaid, S. (2020). Pull Out Method (Withdrawal). Retrieved from
Liu, P. Y., Swerdloff, R. S., Anawalt, B. D., Anderson, R. A., Bremner, W. J., Elliesen, J., ... & Nieschlag, E. (2008). Determinants of the rate and extent of spermatogenic suppression during hormonal male contraception: an integrated analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 93(5), 1774-1783.
Liu, P. Y., Swerdloff, R. S., Christenson, P. D., Handelsman, D. J., & Wang, C. (2006). Rate, extent, and modifiers of spermatogenic recovery after hormonal male contraception: an integrated analysis. The Lancet, 367(9520), 1412-1420.
Luquis, R.R., Brelsford, G.M. & Rojas-Guyler, L. (2012). Religiosity, Spirituality, Sexual Attitudes, and Sexual Behaviors Among College Students. J Relig Health 51, 601–614.
Manetti, G. J., & Honig, S. C. (2010). Update on male hormonal contraception: Is the vasectomy in jeopardy? International Journal of Impotence Research, 22(3), 159-170.
Mayo Clinic. (2021). Vasectomy reversal. Retrieved from
McLachlan, R. I., McDonald, J., Rushford, D., Robertson, D. M., Garrett, C., & Baker, H. G. (2000). Efficacy and acceptability of testosterone implants, alone or in combination with a 5α-reductase inhibitor, for male hormonal contraception. Contraception, 62(2), 73-78.
Meriggiola, M. C., Cerpolini, S., Bremner, W. J., Mbizvo, M. T., Vogelsong, K. M., Martorana, G., & Pelusi, G. (2006). Acceptability of an injectable male contraceptive regimen of norethisterone enanthate and testosterone undecanoate for men. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 21(8), 2033-2040.
Milhausen, R. R., McKay, A., Graham, C. A., Crosby, R. A., Yarber, W. L., & Sanders, S. A. (2013). Prevalence and predictors of condom use in a national sample of Canadian university students. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 22(3), 142-151.
Mommers, E., Kersemaekers, W. M., Elliesen, J., Kepers, M., Apter, D., Behre, H. M., . . . Zitzmann, M. (2008). Male hormonal contraception: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 93(7), 2572-2580.
Peterson, Herbert B., Darmstadt, Gary L., Bongaarts, John. (2013). Meeting the unmet need for family planning: Now is the time. Lancet, The, 381(9879), 1696-1699.
Peterson, L. M., Campbell, M. A. T., & Laky, Z. E. (2019). The next frontier for men’s contraceptive choice: College men’s willingness to pursue male hormonal contraception. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 20(2), 226-237.
Piotrowska, Katarzyna., Wang, Christina., Swerdloff, Ronald S., Liu,Peter Y. (2017). Male hormonal contraception: Hope and promise. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, The, 5(3), 214-223.
Roth, Mara Y., Shih, Grace., Ilani, Niloufar., Wang, Christina., Page, Stephanie T., Bremner, William J, Swerdloff, Ronald S., Sitruk-Ware, Regine., Blithe, Diana L., Amory, John K. (2014). Acceptability of a transdermal gel-based male hormonal contraceptive in a randomized controlled trial. Contraception, 90(4), 407-412.
Sjögren, B., & Gottlieb, C. (2001). Testosterone for male contraception during one year: Attitudes, well-being and quality of sex life. Contraception, 64(1), 59-65.
Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2012). Sticking my finger up at evolution: Unconventionality, selfishness, and choice in the talk of men who have had “preemptive” vasectomies. Men and Masculinities, 15(3), 207-229.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). Family Planning. Retrieved from
Vasilenko, S. A., Kreager, D. A., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2015). Gender, contraceptive attitudes, and condom use in adolescent romantic relationships: a dyadic approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 51-62.
Vera Cruz, G., Humeau, A., Moore, P. J., & Mullet, E. (2019). Identifying determinants of Mozambican men’s willingness to use a male contraceptive pill. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 24(4), 266-273.
Walker, S. (2011). Attitudes to a male contraceptive pill in a group of contraceptive users in the UK. Journal of Men's Health, 8(4), 267-273.
Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Shah, I. H., Liu, Y., & Vogelsong, K. M. (2006). The acceptability of an injectable, once-a-month male contraceptive in china. Contraception, 73(5), 548-553.